Registration of Confirmation

When the Sacrament of Confirmation is celebrated with more than one parish coming together at a single location, the fact of the conferral (names, minister, parents, sponsors, place and date (see Canon 895)) ought to be recorded in two registers.  In the parish where the confirmation takes place, information for each one confirmed is entered, even for those from the visiting parishes.  This is the obligation which canon 895 imposes.  It is appropriate to indicate the parish to which the one confirmed belongs in the “Remarks” or “Annotations” column.  In the confirmation registers of the parishes which are visiting, information for their own particular parishioners should be entered, being sure to note also the place of the confirmation.  This information is then more readily available for reporting the number of parishioners confirmed on the “Annual Report to the Bishop,” for example, or issuing certificates of confirmation.  So if Blessed Sacrament Parish and St. Mary Parish travel to Holy Name of Jesus Parish for Confirmation, the host parish—Holy Name of Jesus Parish—enters information for all who were confirmed into its own register.  Blessed Sacrament Parish and St. Mary Parish record information for their own confirmed parishioners in their own parish registers.  Each individual parish should also notify the place of baptism of the confirmation of its own parishioners.

 

Back to top

 

 

Second Edition of the Rite of Marriage

Archbishop Joseph Kurtz, USCCB President, has issued a decree formally publishing the Order of Celebrating Matrimony, Second Edition, following the completion of the Secretariat of Divine Worship’s standard review process. The new Matrimony rite may be used in the liturgy as of September 8, 2016, and its use is mandatory in the United States beginning on December 30, the Feast of the Holy Family.

                The Federation of Diocesan Liturgical Commissions, in conjunction with the USCCB’s Secretariat on Divine Worship, will host a workshop on Thursday, July 7, in Rochester Minn.; registration information is found at this link.  The Office for Sacred Worship will offer regional workshops in the Diocese for clergy in the fall.

 

Back to top

 

 

Prayers for the Fortnight for Freedom: Witnesses to Freedom

Each year dioceses around the country arrange special events to highlight the importance of defending religious freedom. The Fortnight for Freedom is from June 21—the vigil of the Feasts of St. John Fisher and St. Thomas More—to July 4, Independence Day. The theme for the Fortnight in 2016 is “Witnesses to Freedom.” A full description and links to resources are available here, including “5 Ways to Celebrate the Fortnight for Freedom” and biographies of 14 different “witnesses to freedom,” such as the Little Sisters of the Poor and the recent Coptic Martyrs. Some particular dates and events include:

  • Tuesday, June 21 at 6:30 p.m. – Call to Prayer for Fortnight for Freedom, a Holy Hour led by Bishop Callahan at Blessed Sacrament Church. Each parish, particularly those with the assistance of a deacon, may consider celebrating a Holy Hour at this time or another time during the Fortnight.

  • St. Thomas More and St. John Fisher were prominent 16th century Englishmen who stood against King Henry VIII’s attempted supremacy over the Catholic Church, and accepted martyrdom instead of abandoning their faith. Their relics will be available for veneration at the Cathedral of St. Paul, Minn., from 6:30-8:00 p.m. on Sunday, June 26 and at the Church of St. John the Evangelist in Rochester, Minn., from 12 to 1:30 PM on Tuesday, June 28.

  • Wednesday, June 29 – St. Peter and St. Paul – martyrs for the faith.

  • Sunday, July 3 – Bishop Callahan will celebrate Mass at the Cathedral of St. Joseph the Workman in La Crosse at 10:30 a.m. for to mark the Fortnight.

  • Monday, July 4 – Noon – Church bells to ring in parishes throughout the Diocese, as a sign of affirmation of religious freedom – our first, most cherished liberty.

 

Back to top

 

 

Looking at the Rite of Confirmation

Confirmation, it is sometimes said, is a “sacrament in search of a theology.” It is difficult to appreciate –so the thinking goes – what is unique about Confirmation, what it “does” or “gives” in the Christian life.

It’s tempting to say reflexively that it is the “gift of the Holy Spirit,” yet the indwelling of the Spirit and his gifts begin at Baptism (see CCC, 1266). Or perhaps it’s the sense of “adulthood” and (do we dare say it?) “graduation” into the full-stature of a Christian, even though babies are “chrismated” in the Eastern Churches or, when in danger of death, in the Latin Church. What is Confirmation’s unique contribution to worshipping God or sanctifying me?

 

Part of the problem may come from how the question is posed in the first place – how I have intentionally framed it here. To emphasize a sacrament’s “unique” or “singular” or “particular” character at the expense of its connection to the whole sacramental system will inevitably skew our vision. And the same can be said of any of the sacraments: take any given sacrament on its own, and one risks losing “the forest for the trees,” at it were.

 

The Catechism says from the very start that there is a “certain resemblance between the stages of natural life and the stages of the spiritual life” (1210).  As there is natural birth, development, and nourishment, so is there supernatural generation by Baptism, strengthening by Confirmation, and sustenance in the Eucharist. So, too, are there parallels among the other sacraments. But these first three sacraments, the Sacraments of Initiation, constitute a unity which, for proper pedagogy and praxis, must be maintained. Thus in RCIA – which includes any person seven years or older – each of the sacraments are received together.

 

The relationship between these three sacraments is one of the essential keys to understanding any one of them alone, and this is especially true of Confirmation. Just as in the natural world there is no growth or development or maturation without a beginning birth, so supernaturally any special strengthening must be associated with birth. In other words, to find the elusive theology of Confirmation, one must see it in relation to Baptism.

 

Such is how the Catechism describes Confirmation: “It must be explained to the faithful that the reception of the sacrament of Confirmation is necessary for the completion of baptismal grace. For ‘by the sacrament of Confirmation, [the baptized] are more perfectly bound to the Church and are enriched with a special strength of the Holy Spirit. Hence they are, as true witnesses of Christ, more strictly obliged to spread and defend the faith by word and deed’” (1285). Notice the words used, all relative to the sacrament of rebirth: “completion of baptismal grace”; “more perfectly bound”; “special strength of the Holy Spirit”; “more strictly obliged.” We might summarize Confirmation as an “augmentation” of Baptism. It is “baptism” – but more.

 

When the Sacrament of Confirmation follows immediately the administration of Baptism – as in the East’s practice of initiating infants or the West’s Order for the Christian Initiation of Adults – it is easier to understand and the connection, completion, and augmentation of Confirmation to Baptism. But when these two sacraments are separated by many years, as many as 16 years for most in our Diocese, the relationship becomes strained, the theology less clear, and the appreciation of Confirmation’s beauty less felt.

 

Beginning on Pentecost this year, a newly-translated Rite for Confirmation has been used. Unlike the 3rd edition of the Roman Missal in 2011, or the 2nd edition of the Rite of Marriage later this year, where both a new edition of the rite and a new translation is given, this Rite of Confirmation is more properly a re-translation of the 1st edition of the Rite of Confirmation. But as slight as the changes may sound, the occasion does afford an opportunity to look at the ritual expression of the theology of Confirmation, especially as it relates to, and is clarified by, the Sacrament of Baptism.

 

Here’s four instances where the rite and the theology of Confirmation are tied to Baptism.

 

  1. It is becoming more common for confirmands to wear a white garment over their dress clothes.  While not mandatory, the white robe makes the connection between Baptism and Confirmation more apparent.  At Baptism, before clothing the child with the white garment, the minister says, “You have become a new creation, and have clothed yourselves in Christ.  See in this white garment the outward sign of your Christian dignity” (n.63).  Now, by the strengthening of the Holy Spirit, the confirmand is incorporated more firmly into Christ, which the white signifies still.
  2. There is not much in the Code of Canon Law about the requirements of the Confirmation sponsor, only that he or she “must fulfil the conditions mention in Canon 874,” that is, in the section on the baptismal godparent! In fact, “it is desirable,” the Code says, “that the sponsor chosen [for Confirmation] be the one who undertook this role at baptism” (Can. 8932). At Baptism our godparents committed themselves to helping our natural parents raise us “in the practice of the faith” and to “keep God’s commandments.” Now, at Confirmation, they stand by us again to support us in the life of faith. As natural parents are present at our birth and growth, so our supernatural godparents are present for our supernatural birth and growth.
  3. Immediately prior to the conferral of the sacrament, the confirmands renew their baptismal promises.  At Baptism, parents, godparents, and the entire Church professed the Faith on behalf of the infant.  At Confirmation, the candidates themselves are called upon to renew with their own heart and voice the promises made at Baptism.  After the renewal, the Bishop says, “This is our faith.  This is the faith of the Church.  We are proud to profess it in Christ Jesus our Lord.”  The grace of Confirmation strengthens the confirmand to profess Christ proudly in word and deed.
  4. If baptized as an infant, the child is anointed with sacred chrism immediately after the baptism with water. Sacred chrism is consecrated each year by the Bishop who is joined at the Chrism Mass by his priests. The oil is then taken back to each parish or chapel where parish priests or deacons use the chrism at baptism. Part of the consecration of chrism involves the Bishop breathing over the opening of the vessel of chrism, his ruah or breath not unlike the Spirit which hovered over the waters of creation. Thus at Baptism, the sacred chrism, consecrated by the Bishop, is applied to the baby’s head so that he can conformed to Christ and inspired to live according to the Spirit. At confirmation, this year’s sacred chrism, consecrated by the Bishop, is applied again to the forehead – this time by the Bishop himself – to effect an even greater conformity to Jesus and an even fuller life in the Spirit.

 

Is Confirmation a “sacrament in search of a theology”? Only if we look with one eye closed. When both are open we see a larger picture – one that sees Baptism and Confirmation in the same frame – our understanding and celebration of Confirmation stands out in greater clarity and power.

 

Back to top

 

 

SOME LITURGICAL CLARIFICATIONS

Rite of Baptism of Children

During the “Reception of the Child” at the beginning of the Baptismal Rite, the minister, after questioning the parents and godparents about their willingness to baptize and raise the child according to the faith, is to say:  “N., the Church of God [Ecclesia Dei] welcomes you with great joy...” (versus “N., the Christian community [communitas christiana] welcomes you with great joy….”).  The change was authorized by Pope Benedict XVI on February 22, 2013, in order to clarify the membership in the Mystical Body of Christ, the Church, which baptism causes, rather than simply a community of Christian believers.  See news story here.

 

Purification of Sacred Vessels by a Deacon

While the General Instruction of the Roman Missal allows the priest to purify the sacred vessels “at the altar or the credence table” (n.163), the deacon is to purify the vessels only at the credence table:  “When the distribution of Communion is over, the Deacon returns to the altar with the Priest, collects the fragments, should any remain, and then carries the chalice and other sacred vessels to the credence table, where he purifies them and arranges them as usual, while the Priest returns to the chair” (n.183);  the deacon may also purify the vessels immediately after Mass.  “This clarification of the deacon’s role,” explains the Bishops’ Committee on Divine Worship, “helps to bring forth a further expression of our theology of liturgy and holy orders, matters which are indeed central to our life in the Church.”  See fuller explanation here.

 

Book of Blessings:  On always making use of the Sign of the Holy Cross in Blessings

“Since, from the established usage, the liturgical custom has always been in force that in the rites of blessing the sign of the cross is employed by being traced by the celebrant with the right hand over the persons or things for whom mercy is implored, this Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, in order to dispel any doubts, has established that, even if the text of the part of the Roman ritual entitled The Book of Blessings remains silent about the sign itself or lacks an express mention of the appropriate time for this action, nevertheless the sacred ministers should adopt the aforementioned sign of the cross as necessary when carrying out any blessing.  Without a mention, however, the appropriate time should be regarded as when the text of the blessing uses the words “blessing,” “to bless,” or similar or, lacking these words, when the prayer of blessing itself is concluded.” (From the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, 2002)  See full text here.

 

The Ritual Expression of the Gift of Peace at Mass

Pope Francis, in an audience of June 7, 2014, approved the Circular Letter Pacem relinquo vobis, “Peace I leave you,” on the ritual expression of the gift of peace at Mass.  Beginning with Pope Benedict and the Synod of Bishops celebrated during the 2005 Year of the Eucharist, the liturgical meaning of the exchange of peace and its implications for Christian living have been much discussed.  Among other things, the Circular Letter seeks to instill the deep meaning of the gesture.  “It should be made clear once and for all that the rite of peace…has its own profound meaning of prayer and offering of peace in the context of the Eucharist. An exchange of peace appropriately carried out among the participants at Mass enriches the meaning of the rite itself and gives fuller expression to it. It is entirely correct, therefore, to say that this does not involve inviting the faithful to exchange the sign of peace ‘mechanically.’  … The intimate relationship between the lex orandi and the lex credendi must obviously be extended to the lex vivendi. Today, a serious obligation for Catholics in building a more just and peaceful world is accompanied by a deeper understanding of the Christian meaning of peace and this depends largely on the seriousness with which our particular Churches welcome and invoke the gift of peace and express it in the liturgical celebration.”  See here for the complete text of the Circular Letter, and here for an explanation from the USCCB’s Committee on Divine Worship.

 

Liturgical Practices During Flu Season

Pastors and parochial administrators in the Diocese of La Crosse are to use their own discretion about inviting the exchange of the Sign of Peace and the distribution of the Precious Blood from the chalice during flu seasons.  Individual members of the faithful can also determine for themselves whether to exchange the Sign of Peace with their neighbors or to receive the Precious Blood from the chalice (pastors will please make those in their care aware of this option).  If a significant change in the situation surrounding the flu occurs, further direction from the Diocese will be offered.

 

Back to top

 

 

DIOCESAN LITURGICAL CALENDAR FOR 2016

Click here for the 2016 Diocesan Liturgical Calendar

 

Back to top

 

 

RITE FOR DISTRIBUTING HOLY COMMUNION

Click here for the "Rite of Distributing Holy Communion Outside Mass", updated in light of the translation of the third edition of the Roman Missal.

 

Back to top